<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killing The Myth: The Machine SID Duplication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/</link>
	<description>Windows Server 2008, Server Core, Foundation Server, Virtualization, Hyper-V, Virtual PC...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzy_j</title>
		<link>http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzy_j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>Exchange 2010 SP1 breaks completely if your Doamin controller and Exchange server had the same SID, so I&#039;m affraid Mark is completely mistaken on this one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exchange 2010 SP1 breaks completely if your Doamin controller and Exchange server had the same SID, so I&#8217;m affraid Mark is completely mistaken on this one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zdravke</title>
		<link>http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-10238</link>
		<dc:creator>Zdravke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/#comment-10238</guid>
		<description>Agreed! This is the most surprising statement I came across for a long time. Just try to add a Windows machine to a domain with sid duplicated to one already in a domain, and it would not work! It&#039;s so easy to verify in so many different ways!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! This is the most surprising statement I came across for a long time. Just try to add a Windows machine to a domain with sid duplicated to one already in a domain, and it would not work! It&#8217;s so easy to verify in so many different ways!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nospam</title>
		<link>http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/comment-page-1/#comment-10216</link>
		<dc:creator>Nospam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajkovic.info/windows-server-2008/the-machine-sid-duplication/#comment-10216</guid>
		<description>BS.  Mark had to drink the Microsoft cool-aid.  Dupliocate SIDs are a problem for both the OS, security as well as third party applications which assume and require unique macine SIDs.  What really happened is that some sensitive Microsoft dev people forced Mark to issue a retraction.  They don&#039;t after all like to have their sensitive development egos inconvenienced in any way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BS.  Mark had to drink the Microsoft cool-aid.  Dupliocate SIDs are a problem for both the OS, security as well as third party applications which assume and require unique macine SIDs.  What really happened is that some sensitive Microsoft dev people forced Mark to issue a retraction.  They don&#8217;t after all like to have their sensitive development egos inconvenienced in any way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

